
LDAS Meeting Minutes for November 15th, 1999
NASA Goddard
**Next meeting set for 12/10/99, 1pm, NCEP
--Alan volunteered to give the LDAS-related AGU talk.
--LDAS members should begin to think about LDAS presentations for Spring AGU conference.
--A general LDAS overview will most likely be submitted to BAMS.
--Several LDAS-related papers could be submitted to a special issue of the Journal of Hydrometeorology.
--300 basins out of a pool of 2000 have a high enough density of rain guages to be used
--About 100 of these are in the Mississippi Basin.
--Daily OH precipitation values are available for these 100 basins, with hourly values on the way.
--UW meteorological variables are available for these basins as well.
--Some basins are suspect because of bad e/ep values.
--ARM/CART site will be first test area for basins.
--All 2000 basin boundaries are now available in an ascii format from Yun’s ftp site. John will tag the 100 basins located in the Mississippi Basin.
--Eric is starting to extract the NOHRSC data and put it into a GIS framework.
--Ken met with Tom Carrol….NOHRSC has a snow/water equivalent product that is available 23 hours after real-time.
--National snow cover, updated 3 times per week, will be placed in GRIB format and made available in the near future.
--NOAH will pull in snow water equivalent data and is leaning toward a "straight update" method. They will keep track of water budget variables needed to close the water budget.
--The VIC model appears to be in-between the Mosaic and NOAH models in terms of soil wetness.
--Initial conditions used by VIC model (provided by NOAA) proved to be too wet.
--Differences between VIC and GOES skin temperature exist. Biases are similar to those seen in the NOAH model.
--VIC model may be included in the generic NASA model driver program….especially for retrospective runs.
--Dan Tarpley’s algorithm was developed over the ocean, but it also seems to perform well over land.
--GOES radiation data is usually "cooler" than ARM data, but does not differ by too much in general. A different algorithm will be tried and validated in the future.
--All groups should start validating as soon as possible against quantities besides skin temperature.
--Mosaic produces relatively accurate latent heat flux values, NOAH produces values which are too low because of overly large canopy resistance values.
--All groups should submit July-Oct 1999 LHF values for a specific grid point (Champaign Ill.) for validation purposes.
--Snow accumulation/melting will be examined more closely. Resublimation and/or melting processes appear to be creating bad snow values.
--As long as the ~100 basins in the Mississippi Basin are reasonable in test runs, they will be used in the mainstream Sacramento runs.
--Output from Sacramento model will be included on LDAS web page.
--Dag acquired EROS data, needs 1/8th degree river direction mask from OH.
--Also needs velocity data.
--Added 4km raw Stage 4 precipitation to NCEP forcing files.
--Fixed radiation processing problem in NCEP forcing files.
--An 1/8th degree Stage 4 precipitation product will soon be added to the NCEP forcing files which does not have precipitation "holes" filled in by EDAS data.
--Upward and downward solar and longwave radiation may be added to forcing fields in the future
--Maybe each group should generate their own restart file and use it as opposed to the NOAA-derived restart file.
--A bucket model could also be used to initialize each model. VIC will test this concept.
--Wayne Higgins is producing a ¼ degree, daily, gauge-only precipitation product.
--Will span 50 years and cover a domain slightly larger than the LDAS domain
--Processing of data to create a 24 parameter UMD subset of the 71 NOAA/NESDIS parameters is proceeding. 2 years are complete, July 1998 is almost done.
--The next LDAS meeting should focus on radiation issues.
Action Items: